Updates on ISO 14155 and N=1 Therapeutics Discussed by TGA
Investigators need to modify trial protocols and safety reporting mechanisms in line with the latest ISO 14155 updates to ensure compliance for upcoming high-risk clinical trials.
Primary source: Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)
Refined classification criteria for determining whether a product falls under Medical Device Regulations or Human Medicines Regulations, particularly affecting alcohol-only pre-injection swabs and wipes.
Accurate classification ensures compliance with the correct reporting frameworks, thereby enhancing safety monitoring and regulatory adherence.
Organizations must update their adverse event reporting processes to align with the clarified classification of borderline products effective immediately.
Regulatory Intelligence Lead
Review in the next regulatory intelligence cycle.
Refinement of criteria used to distinguish between products regulated under Medical Device Regulations 2002 and those under Human Medicines Regulations 2012.
Classification determines the applicable safety reporting framework (MDR vs. GVP). Changes or clarifications in classification affect which adverse event reporting rules and workflows apply to specific 'borderline' products.
Organizations must update their adverse event reporting processes to align with the clarified classification of borderline products effective immediately.
The MHRA has refined criteria for distinguishing between medical devices and medicinal products, particularly affecting the classification of borderline products like alcohol-only pre-injection swabs and wipes. This clarification impacts the applicable safety reporting frameworks (MDR vs. GVP) for adverse event reporting.
What changed: Refined classification criteria for determining whether a product falls under Medical Device Regulations or Human Medicines Regulations, particularly affecting alcohol-only pre-injection swabs and wipes.
Why it matters: Accurate classification ensures compliance with the correct reporting frameworks, thereby enhancing safety monitoring and regulatory adherence.
Practical implication: Organizations must update their adverse event reporting processes to align with the clarified classification of borderline products effective immediately.
Published from the Firecrawl policy change extraction pipeline.
Investigators need to modify trial protocols and safety reporting mechanisms in line with the latest ISO 14155 updates to ensure compliance for upcoming high-risk clinical trials.
Safety lead to: (1) perform a UK-clinical-trial safety reporting gap assessment against MHRA’s effective guidance sections (MedDRA coding; AE/SAE; RSI governance; SUSARs; annual safety reporting; USMs; serious breaches; temporary suspension), (2) update controlled SOPs/WIs and training records to reflect “effective” status as of 28 Apr 2026, and (3) document deviations/gaps and open CAPA where needed for ongoing UK trials and new submissions.
Sponsors and MAHs must review and align safety data collection and reporting protocols with the newly adopted guidelines while preparing for implementation of PRAC recommendations stemming from this meeting.
Healthcare facilities must utilize the new checklist during inspections to conduct gap analyses and ensure compliance with reporting requirements associated with their vigilance systems.