MHRA Class 2 Recall: ChloraPrep 2% applicators (potential sterility breach)
Identify and quarantine all impacted batches of ChloraPrep 2% 1mL and Frepp 2% 1.5mL applicators; return to Becton Dickinson UK Ltd.
2 SOPs may need review
FDA posted a January 2025 draft, Level 1 guidance on AI supporting regulatory decision-making for drugs and biologics (Docket FDA-2024-D-4689).
1) Inventory AI use cases that could feed regulated decisions (including PV/safety-related analyses or summaries used in regulatory interactions) and map owners/vendors. 2) For each AI use case, document context of use, intended outputs, and controls (e.g., review/approval, traceability, change management) aligned to a draft-guidance tracking plan. 3) Track the Federal Register notice and plan whether to submit comments within the window described by FDA (90 days after Federal Register publication).
PV Technology / CSV Lead (with PV Quality Lead and Regulatory Intelligence Lead; escalation to QPPV/PV Operations Lead as needed)
Monitor FDA docket/activity for this draft guidance and the associated Federal Register notice; consider comment submission within 90 days of Federal Register publication (per FDA draft PDF).
Primary-source confirmation recommended before operational implementation.
FDA published a draft guidance (January 2025) titled “Considerations for the Use of Artificial Intelligence To Support Regulatory Decision-Making for Drug and Biological Products.” FDA’s landing page identifies it as Draft, Level 1 guidance and “Not for implementation,” and lists Docket FDA-2024-D-4689 with a link to a Federal Register notice. The draft PDF states that comments should be submitted within 90 days of publication in the Federal Register notice announcing the draft document.
Although not PV-specific, the FDA draft guidance explicitly addresses AI used to support regulatory decision-making for drugs and biologics—an area that can overlap with PV outputs when AI tools generate or transform analyses, summaries, or interpretations that could influence regulated safety conclusions or be reused in regulatory interactions. For PV and quality organizations, this raises near-term governance and inspection/submission readiness considerations: knowing which AI-enabled outputs could be referenced in regulated contexts, who owns them (including vendors), and whether documentation and controls are sufficiently robust to support oversight and change management expectations signaled by FDA’s draft framework.
1) Inventory AI use cases that could feed regulated decisions (including PV/safety-related analyses or summaries used in regulatory interactions) and map owners/vendors. 2) For each AI use case, document context of use, intended outputs, and controls (e.g., review/approval, traceability, change management) aligned to a draft-guidance tracking plan. 3) Track the Federal Register notice and plan whether to submit comments within the window described by FDA (90 days after Federal Register publication).
Identify and quarantine all impacted batches of ChloraPrep 2% 1mL and Frepp 2% 1.5mL applicators; return to Becton Dickinson UK Ltd.
2 SOPs may need review
Identify affected lots and implement recall procedures as per Health Canada guidelines.
2 SOPs may need review
Review adverse event reports for potential links to counterfeit weight loss medicines; check product supply chain for unlicensed sources.
2 SOPs may need review
Marketing authorisation holders should prepare to update their COVID-19 vaccines to target the XFG variant for the upcoming campaign; monitor for further regulatory guidance and prepare for potential strain change submissions.
2 SOPs may need review