Practical implication
MAHs must ensure draft protocols are placed correctly in the CTD and that submission planning considers the clarified assessment timelines, with RMP updates contingent upon PRAC endorsement.
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has updated its guidance for marketing authorisation holders (MAHs) regarding non-interventional imposed post-authorisation safety studies (PASS). New assessment timelines for clinical protocol submissions include a maximum of 74 days for PRAC review, followed by 67 days for European Commission decision-making. Draft protocols must now be submitted in Module 1.8.2 of the Common Technical Document (CTD), and updates to risk management plans (RMP) should occur only after PRAC endorsement.
What changed: EMA established that draft protocols for non-interventional imposed PASS should now be submitted in Module 1.8.2 and aligned submission timelines for assessments are defined as 74 days for PRAC review and 67 days for EC decision.
Why it matters: MAHs need to adjust their planning and submission processes to comply with these updated timelines and requirements, which could significantly impact the speed of study implementation and monitoring of safety signals.
Practical implication: MAHs must ensure draft protocols are placed correctly in the CTD and that submission planning considers the clarified assessment timelines, with RMP updates contingent upon PRAC endorsement.
View original source
Published from the Firecrawl policy change extraction pipeline.