PV Bulletin

Variations Requiring Assessment (Veterinary Medicines) - Q&A Update

The EMA updates its procedural Q&A for veterinary medicines, adding Question 23 regarding variations requiring assessment.

PV Impact Brief

Urgency: HighConfidence: high

What changed

Addition of Question 23 to the procedural Q&A regarding variations for veterinary products.

Why it matters

This update enables MAHs to better navigate the requirements for submitting variations, streamlining the process for regulatory compliance in handling veterinary medicinal products.

Action needed

MAHs are advised to incorporate the updated FAQs into their compliance workflows and ensure that their submissions adhere to the updated guidance.

Relevant for
Regulatory Intelligence LeadQPPV
Processes impacted
Country Compliance
Owner

Regulatory Intelligence Lead

Review cadence

Review whenever updates to EMA guidance are published.

Policy change details

Document type
Q&A
Policy status
revised
Publication date
2026-07-03
Policy change
The EMA has updated its Q&A on variations requiring assessment for veterinary medicines by adding Question 23.

Key changes

Addition of Question 23 to the procedural Q&A regarding variations for veterinary products.

Affected workflows

Country Compliance

Responsible groups

Regulatory AffairsPharmacovigilance

PV impact

Minor procedural update for veterinary MAH regulatory teams handling variations.

View regulator source

Source document details

Exact policy details

Submission of variations
Centrally authorised veterinary medicines require assessment under Regulation (EU) 2019/6.
Applies to: Applies to all marketing authorisation holders submitting variations for centrally authorised veterinary medicines.
This page provides guidance on how to apply for a variation on centrally authorised veterinary medicines requiring assessment under the Veterinary Medicinal Products Regulation. · p. 1 · High · Source
Electronic submission
Mandatory submission via the EMA e-Submission Gateway or Syncplicity Web Client.
Applies to: All submissions to the EMA related to applications for central marketing authorisation.
Electronic submission via the EMA e-Submission Gateway or Syncplicity Web Client is mandatory. · p. 1 · High · Source
Worksharing procedures
Complete dossier must be submitted via Gateway/Syncplicity Web Client for each centrally authorised product.
Applies to: Applies to worksharing procedures for centrally authorized products and nationally authorized products.
For worksharing procedures, the complete dossier should be submitted via the Gateway/Syncplicity Web Client for each centrally authorised product included in the worksharing procedure. · p. 2 · High · Source

Evidence and confidence

Confidence: highSource updated: Jul 3, 2026

Full briefing

Practical implication

MAHs are advised to incorporate the updated FAQs into their compliance workflows and ensure that their submissions adhere to the updated guidance.

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has added Question 23 to its Q&A on variations requiring assessment (VRA) for veterinary medicines, involving a minor procedural update for marketing authorisation holders (MAHs) handling such variations.

What changed: Addition of Question 23 to the procedural Q&A regarding variations for veterinary products.

Why it matters: This update enables MAHs to better navigate the requirements for submitting variations, streamlining the process for regulatory compliance in handling veterinary medicinal products.

Practical implication: MAHs are advised to incorporate the updated FAQs into their compliance workflows and ensure that their submissions adhere to the updated guidance.

View original source

Published from the Firecrawl policy change extraction pipeline.

Related updates for your role

publicMedicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) · United Kingdom · Updated May 23, 2026

MHRA confirms UK clinical trial safety reporting guidance is effective

Urgency: High

Safety lead to: (1) perform a UK-clinical-trial safety reporting gap assessment against MHRA’s effective guidance sections (MedDRA coding; AE/SAE; RSI governance; SUSARs; annual safety reporting; USMs; serious breaches; temporary suspension), (2) update controlled SOPs/WIs and training records to reflect “effective” status as of 28 Apr 2026, and (3) document deviations/gaps and open CAPA where needed for ongoing UK trials and new submissions.

ICSRCountry ComplianceRegulatory Intelligence Lead
SOP Impact4 SOPs
ConfidenceHigh
Relevant for: Regulatory Intelligence Lead, QPPV
verifiedRegulatory action: Guidance
Read impact briefarrow_forward
publicEuropean Medicines Agency · EU · Updated Jul 15, 2026

Reflection paper on particulars for safety signals for (traditional) herbal medicinal products

Urgency: High

Implement increased documentation and reporting processes for traditional herbal medicinal products. Ensure staff receive training on the complexities involved in signal management for these products.

Signal ManagementRegulatory Intelligence Lead
SOP Impact1 SOPs
ConfidenceHigh
Relevant for: Regulatory Intelligence Lead, Signal Management Lead
verifiedRegulatory action: Draft Guidance
Read impact briefarrow_forward
publicSwissmedic · Switzerland · Updated Jul 17, 2026

Checklist for the Inspection of Medical Device Vigilance in Hospitals

Urgency: High

Healthcare facilities must utilize the new checklist during inspections to conduct gap analyses and ensure compliance with reporting requirements associated with their vigilance systems.

Inspection ReadinessRegulatory Intelligence Lead
SOP Impact1 SOPs
ConfidenceHigh
Relevant for: Regulatory Intelligence Lead, PV Quality Lead
verifiedRegulatory action: Checklist
Read impact briefarrow_forward
publicEuropean Medicines Agency · EU · Updated Jul 15, 2026

Updated eCTD v4.0 technical validation criteria

Urgency: High

All electronic PV submissions must undergo new validation checks in accordance with the updated criteria to ensure compliance and accuracy.

Country ComplianceICSRRegulatory Intelligence Lead
SOP Impact2 SOPs
ConfidenceHigh
Relevant for: Regulatory Intelligence Lead, QPPV
verifiedRegulatory action: Technical Guidance
Read impact briefarrow_forward