Practical implication
MAHs are advised to incorporate the updated FAQs into their compliance workflows and ensure that their submissions adhere to the updated guidance.
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has added Question 23 to its Q&A on variations requiring assessment (VRA) for veterinary medicines, involving a minor procedural update for marketing authorisation holders (MAHs) handling such variations.
What changed: Addition of Question 23 to the procedural Q&A regarding variations for veterinary products.
Why it matters: This update enables MAHs to better navigate the requirements for submitting variations, streamlining the process for regulatory compliance in handling veterinary medicinal products.
Practical implication: MAHs are advised to incorporate the updated FAQs into their compliance workflows and ensure that their submissions adhere to the updated guidance.
View original source
Published from the Firecrawl policy change extraction pipeline.